Difference between revisions of "Talk:Murfy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Shouldn't J M Murphy have a separate page? iHeckler9') |
(→Manual mistranslation: new section) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't J M Murphy have a separate page? | Shouldn't J M Murphy have a separate page? | ||
iHeckler9 | iHeckler9 | ||
+ | :Why would we create multiple separate pages for one character? That's what redirects are for. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 14:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Manual mistranslation == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The footnote in the Rayman 3 manual doesn't really make much sense. It would make more sense for Ubi Soft to not accept responsibility, saying that the manual is solely responsible for the comment. Having looked at the French version, I think this discrepancy may be due to a simple mistranslation. Is this correct, and, if so, should it be mentioned? --[[User:Plumgmk|Plumgmk]] ([[User talk:Plumgmk|talk]]) 19:43, 21 April 2014 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 18:43, 21 April 2014
Shouldn't J M Murphy have a separate page? iHeckler9
- Why would we create multiple separate pages for one character? That's what redirects are for. —Spiraldoor 14:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Manual mistranslation
The footnote in the Rayman 3 manual doesn't really make much sense. It would make more sense for Ubi Soft to not accept responsibility, saying that the manual is solely responsible for the comment. Having looked at the French version, I think this discrepancy may be due to a simple mistranslation. Is this correct, and, if so, should it be mentioned? --Plumgmk (talk) 19:43, 21 April 2014 (CEST)