Talk:Jacquouille: Difference between revisions
RayGamer99 (talk | contribs) |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I’m not sure who decided that this was a good idea, but I would like to politely ask to please put this information back in the [[Livingstone]] article. These enemies are simply variations of the Explorer Livingstones, and aside from their clothes, they don’t act much differently. It’d be like if we made a whole separate article on the [[Hunter]]s from [[Rayman Raving Rabbids (Game Boy Advance)|the GBA version of Rayman Raving Rabbids]] just because of their different clothing. As for the name, at least in the audio files, there is only one file that calls them “Jacquouilles”, and that is, to my knowledge, only used for ambience in the [[Breathing Fire!]] level. Their voice clips and other audio files call them “bandits”, which I believe fits them better, especially taking into account their [[Ancient Egg]] heist in the opening of [[Rayman Adventures]]. I do believe that there may need to be a slight change in the article to distinguish the bandit Livingstones from their explorer counterparts, but I do not believe that it deserves an entirely different page. At the end of the day, they are still Livingstones, just in different clothing. | I’m not sure who decided that this was a good idea, but I would like to politely ask to please put this information back in the [[Livingstone]] article. These enemies are simply variations of the Explorer Livingstones, and aside from their clothes, they don’t act much differently. It’d be like if we made a whole separate article on the [[Hunter]]s from [[Rayman Raving Rabbids (Game Boy Advance)|the GBA version of Rayman Raving Rabbids]] just because of their different clothing. As for the name, at least in the audio files, there is only one file that calls them “Jacquouilles”, and that is, to my knowledge, only used for ambience in the [[Breathing Fire!]] level. Their voice clips and other audio files call them “bandits”, which I believe fits them better, especially taking into account their [[Ancient Egg]] heist in the opening of [[Rayman Adventures]]. I do believe that there may need to be a slight change in the article to distinguish the bandit Livingstones from their explorer counterparts, but I do not believe that it deserves an entirely different page. At the end of the day, they are still Livingstones, just in different clothing. | ||
-RayGamer99 | -RayGamer99 | ||
:Hi, the change was made in response to [https://raymanpc.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1468273#p1468273 this post], which requested a split at the end of last year. I suggested a compromise at the time, and eventually went ahead with it today after almost 9 months (!) without a reply. | |||
:Since the change is apparently not so consensual, I suggest we collect more feedback in the next few days and organize a vote if the outcome of the discussion is not clear. What do you think? —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 17:18, 23 August 2024 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 15:18, 23 August 2024
Switch it back
I’m not sure who decided that this was a good idea, but I would like to politely ask to please put this information back in the Livingstone article. These enemies are simply variations of the Explorer Livingstones, and aside from their clothes, they don’t act much differently. It’d be like if we made a whole separate article on the Hunters from the GBA version of Rayman Raving Rabbids just because of their different clothing. As for the name, at least in the audio files, there is only one file that calls them “Jacquouilles”, and that is, to my knowledge, only used for ambience in the Breathing Fire! level. Their voice clips and other audio files call them “bandits”, which I believe fits them better, especially taking into account their Ancient Egg heist in the opening of Rayman Adventures. I do believe that there may need to be a slight change in the article to distinguish the bandit Livingstones from their explorer counterparts, but I do not believe that it deserves an entirely different page. At the end of the day, they are still Livingstones, just in different clothing. -RayGamer99
- Hi, the change was made in response to this post, which requested a split at the end of last year. I suggested a compromise at the time, and eventually went ahead with it today after almost 9 months (!) without a reply.
- Since the change is apparently not so consensual, I suggest we collect more feedback in the next few days and organize a vote if the outcome of the discussion is not clear. What do you think? —
17:18, 23 August 2024 (CEST)